[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-test-list
Subject:    Re: Rawhide Report Rawhide 20160226.n.1
From:       Adam Williamson <adamwill () fedoraproject ! org>
Date:       2016-02-27 20:40:22
Message-ID: 1456605622.15301.130.camel () fedoraproject ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, 2016-02-27 at 13:12 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:10:15PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > 
> > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160226.n.0
> > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160226.n.1

> It appears that a new format of "Rawhide Report Rawhide" is skimping
> on a rather important information about broken dependencies.  That means
> that if they appear, and they do show up with regularity, the choices
> are either to wait quietly and hope that such breakage will be noticed
> and fixed, eventually, or file a bugzilla report (maybe after some delay
> - but how long?).  Any sage suggestions?  The best would be to have
> a broken dependencies info back.

We are working on it. There is a *lot* of stuff that needs doing for
the Pungi 4 switchover. Dennis is aware of the missing depcheck
information and working on getting it back.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]