[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-test-list
Subject:    Re: Proposal for enhancement of criterion
From:       Adam Williamson <awilliam () redhat ! com>
Date:       2012-01-31 17:48:19
Message-ID: 1328032099.12997.11.camel () adam
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:15 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:

> > > Especially saving failures to disk is important for installation
> > > without net access. There are test cases [1], [2] and [3] for
> > > testing this feature.
> > > 
> > > [1]
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla
> > > [2]
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_disk
> > > [3]
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> > > 
> > 
> > Ah, that's part of my last-reply-but-one. :) I think certainly adding
> > local disk at Alpha is reasonable. I'm not so sure about supporting
> > saving to a remote system via ssh at Alpha.
> 
> Ok, I would propose to change test case [1] to non-blocking. I think it could be \
> enough to support saving reports only to disk and bugzilla. So I propose criterion: \
>  "The installer must be able to report failures to Bugzilla and local disk, with \
> appropriate information included" 
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
> 

That seems reasonable to me. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]