[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-test-list
Subject:    Re: If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora read this
From:       Felix Miata <mrmazda () ij ! net>
Date:       2009-05-17 23:54:48
Message-ID: 4A10A3C8.9060700 () ij ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2009/05/17 13:58 (GMT-0430) Patrick O'Callaghan composed:

> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 11:48 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:

>> On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 09:43 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:

	http://keithp.com/blogs/Sharpening_the_Intel_Driver_Focus/

>> > Please don't cross-post. I already saw this on fedora-list, probably
>> > along with everyone else here.

>> I didn't, because I'm not subscribed to fedora-list.

> Your choice, but I'd have to ask why. In a couple of weeks all the F11
> stuff is going to go there and not here. It doesn't seem logical to
> subscribe to f-t-l and not to f-l, but again, that's your call. I'd be
> very surprised if it was the common case.

The way I understand it, there are different groups for different interests.
I don't subscribe to f-l. It has too much traffic for my time. Why do we have
multiple lists? Why not just one Fedora list for all posts?

Some threads don't clearly belong on only one list. Without multi-posting in
ambiguous cases, those on only one list where it might fit could easily miss
something important. Suffering the traffic of a high volume list is a high
price to pay to avoid missing something rightly on topic on another list
where traffic is more focused and less voluminous. Better those who agreed in
advance to high volume suffer the occasional multi-post.
-- 
"A fool gives full vent to his anger, but a wise man
keeps himself under control."	Proverbs 29:11 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]