[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-test-list
Subject:    Service initialization
From:       Christopher Beland <beland () alum ! mit ! edu>
Date:       2009-01-31 6:56:42
Message-ID: 1233385002.2613.12.camel () diet-anarchy ! localdomain
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 22:59 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> This is not really an anacron problem even if after an update it
> does not trigger such messages anymore.  See
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479180#c5
> how to get around that and similar issues.  An open question is what
> should really take care about such rearrangements.

So according to:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/20SecondStartup

Upstart is or will hopefully be starting services in parallel.  If this
is the case, do the S and K numbers in the symlinks in /etc/rc5.d/*
really mean much anymore?  Would it be a useful smoke test to reverse
them all and make sure everything still works?

It would actually be interesting to know whether Fedora is trying the
"there are three critical paths" approach to fast booting, or "mostly
the same as always with a few tweaks" or "just start everything at once
and let the kernel sort it out", or something else?

-B.

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]