'Re: Disseminating information about F22 containing some F21 packages'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-marketing-list
Subject:    Re: Disseminating information about F22 containing some F21 packages
From:       Ryan Lerch <rlerch () redhat ! com>
Date:       2015-05-26 10:40:19
Message-ID: 55644D93.40109 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

On 05/26/2015 06:03 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi Ryan!
>
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:14 +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> I saw it in the pending queue this morning.
>>
>> I just added a little bit to the front of the article to explain the
>> issue a bit more.
> Thanks - that certainly improves the post :)
>
>> One thing that might be good to add to it would be maybe a link to
>> the mailing list post / wiki article that explains the decision to
>> not mass rebuild. That might be of use to our more curious readers.
>> However, i couldnt find the mailing list post or wiki article (if it
>> exists, i dont know :) )
> I did find something, but I'm not too sure if it's worth including:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1349
>
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-22-No-Mass
> -Rebuild
>
> I think it's too much detail and will require us to explain the fesco
> ticket and things. I think saying "there just wasn't time on the
> schedule" is better, especially since the target audience here is the
> end-user. What do you think?
>
>> Moved it back to draft status for you to double check my changes --
>> feel free to remove them if you want :)
>>
>> this post is probably good to be posted after the release
>> announcement goes out too IMHO.
> I've moved the post back to the review queue. Do we have a wp-scheduler
> thing? You could just mark it to be published later, maybe a few hours
> after the release, and forget about it :)

Awesome!

Yeah, good point to leave out the discussion -- if it was a simple 
discussion, it might be ok to put it in, but it isnt a real easy one to 
follow, so you are right -- best to leave it out.

I have done up a quick graphic for the featured image -- and have 
scheduled the post to be published at 1400 today (US Eastern time) -- 
AFAICT the release is happening at 1000 US eastern time.

cheers, and thanks for the post!

--ryanlerch

>
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/26/2015 06:03 PM, Ankur Sinha
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:1432627431.3216.63.camel@gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">Hi Ryan!

On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:14 +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote:
</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">Thanks! 

I saw it in the pending queue this morning.

I just added a little bit to the front of the article to explain the 
issue a bit more.
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">
Thanks - that certainly improves the post :)

</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">
One thing that might be good to add to it would be maybe a link to 
the mailing list post / wiki article that explains the decision to 
not mass rebuild. That might be of use to our more curious readers. 
However, i couldnt find the mailing list post or wiki article (if it 
exists, i dont know :) )
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">
I did find something, but I'm not too sure if it's worth including:

<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" \
href="https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1349">https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1349</a>

<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" \
href="https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&amp;px=Fedora-22-No-Mass">https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&amp;px=Fedora-22-No-Mass</a>

-Rebuild

I think it's too much detail and will require us to explain the fesco
ticket and things. I think saying "there just wasn't time on the
schedule" is better, especially since the target audience here is the
end-user. What do you think?

</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre wrap="">
Moved it back to draft status for you to double check my changes -- 
feel free to remove them if you want :)

this post is probably good to be posted after the release 
announcement goes out too IMHO.
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre wrap="">
I've moved the post back to the review queue. Do we have a wp-scheduler
thing? You could just mark it to be published later, maybe a few hours
after the release, and forget about it :)</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Awesome!<br>
    <br>
    Yeah, good point to leave out the discussion -- if it was a simple
    discussion, it might be ok to put it in, but it isnt a real easy one
    to follow, so you are right -- best to leave it out.<br>
    <br>
    I have done up a quick graphic for the featured image -- and have
    scheduled the post to be published at 1400 today (US Eastern time)
    -- AFAICT the release is happening at 1000 US eastern time.<br>
    <br>
    cheers, and thanks for the post!<br>
    <br>
    --ryanlerch<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:1432627431.3216.63.camel@gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">
</pre>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
List info or to change your subscription:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 