[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-marketing-list
Subject:    [In the news] Fedora Board likely to reconsider SQLNinja,
From:       Rahul Sundaram <metherid () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-11-17 10:49:57
Message-ID: AANLkTi=LzQL9rx_DaSUeMBV8x=p7dWLpfe_zhjQWXiXi () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Hi

http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/68571

"The chorus crying about the exclusion of SQLNinja has nothing at stake,
nothing at risk if Fedora ships SQLNinja. On the other hand, Fedora as a
project under Red Hat's wing can expose the parent company to legal risk =
=97
not to mention risk to its reputation. Imagine for a moment the headlines
about Red Hat shipping a SQL Server takeover tool in Fedora 15, especially
if it actually is *used* to conduct an attack of any magnitude. If you want
to get on the slippery slope, Red Hat and the Fedora Board have very good
reasons for rejecting SQLNinja."

Rahul

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

Hi<br><br><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/68571">http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/68571</a><br><br>&quot;The \
chorus crying about the exclusion of SQLNinja has nothing at stake,  nothing at risk \
if Fedora ships SQLNinja. On the other hand, Fedora as a  project under Red Hat&#39;s \
wing can expose the parent company to legal  risk — not to mention risk to its \
reputation. Imagine for a moment the  headlines about Red Hat shipping a SQL Server \
takeover tool in Fedora  15, especially if it actually is <em>used</em> to conduct an \
attack of  any magnitude. If you want to get on the slippery slope, Red Hat and the
 Fedora Board have very good reasons for rejecting SQLNinja.&quot;<br><br>Rahul<br>



-- 
marketing mailing list
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]