[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-marketing-list
Subject:    Re: development cycle (Was: Re:
From:       Rahul Sundaram <sundaram () fedoraproject ! org>
Date:       2006-01-31 6:32:00
Message-ID: 43DF0190.2020705 () fedoraproject ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Yes, but will there be GNOME 2.14 packages for FC4 while it still
>>>is "current" and not moved to Legacy, like what was done with
>>>KDE?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Unlikely.
>>    
>>
>
>This is exactly what I don't understand, would the same apply should
>Fedora be based on QT and KDE for those packages too, then?
>
Fedora Core KDE packages are maintained by a single developer and is 
generally more monolithic than Fedora Core GNOME packages. It is upto 
the maintainer to determine whether the updates can go into a already 
existing version of Fedora Core or whether its too intrusive for an update.

-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]