[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-marketing-list
Subject:    Re: Selling systems with Fedora preloaded.
From:       Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk () redhat ! com>
Date:       2005-11-29 15:06:26
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0511291004330.23444 () gdk ! devel ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


Yeah.  Clarifying the position of Fedora Extras is a clear goal.

I'd like to be able to say:

Any distribution of FC + any strict subset of Extras == official Fedora

Any distribution of FC + other stuff (maybe + signed agreement, depending) 
== based on Fedora

--g

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Matthew Miller wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:47:00PM -0500, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
> > Yes, this kinda brakes the "keep it simple" objective... In any case, 
> > from what I gather even delivering Fedora Extras packages can be 
> > considered non standard.
> 
> If that's the case now, that *must* be changed in the clarified/additional
> rules being worked on.
> 
> -- 
> Matthew Miller           mattdm@mattdm.org          <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> 
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
> 

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]