[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: fedora-list
Subject: Re: New kernel
From: Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan () gmail ! com>
Date: 2021-07-24 10:05:40
Message-ID: b86ee73cab11445e2aa8a845a5e2d4bc1949fee9.camel () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 13:56 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 12:48 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> <pocallaghan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 21:09 +0300, jarmo wrote:
> > > Somethin went't wrong. Got updates of new kernel,
> > > kernel-5.13.4-200.fc34.x86_64.
> > >
> > > Now my HPlaptop won't start. I can write to loginwindow
> > > asked passwd. After that everything hangs.
> > > with kernel 5.12.15-300.fc34.x86_64 works. I have system in
> > > legacy
> > > mode, no LVM no UEFI.
> > > Only patitions there are /swap and / FS is EXT4...
> > > An my wife's Toshiba Satellite, After I disabled /dev/zram0 from
> > > system, because from boot.log I could see, that It tried to
> > > create
> > > SWAP to /dev/zram0. That Toshiba has also partitions /swap and /
> > > EXT4 no LVM no UEFI.
> > > After disbling, it boots, but takes terrible time, "fedora
> > > sircle"
> > > stops and takes long time to start XFCE4 VM.
> >
> > I have that kernel and had to hard-reset my system after load
> > average
> > went to over 30, apparently due to a BTRFS cache flush process. May
> > or
> > may not be related. It has never happened before.
>
> If you can find the boot this happened in and file a bug against the
> kernel, that would be great:
>
> This can help find the boot that it happened with
> journalctl --list-boots
>
> I also will use this method to iterate to find the boot, with the
> kernel appearing in the first line.
> journalctl -b-1
> journalctl -b-2
> and so on, goes back each boot
>
> For the log to attach, you can filter just for kernel messages with
>
> journalctl -b-3 -k -o short-monotonic --no-hostname > dmesg.txt
>
> So that's the 3rd boot back, kernel messages only, monotonic time
> stamps, and no hostname, directed to a file that you can attach to
> the
> bug.
>
Before I posting to BZ I noticed this at the end of dmesg.txt (captured
as you said):
[104791.682109] kernel: CPU: 7 PID: 150724 Comm: ThreadPoolSingl Tainted: P B \
OE 5.13.4-200.fc34.x86_64 #1 [104791.682111] kernel: Hardware name: MSI \
MS-7808/B75MA-E33 (MS-7808), BIOS V1.7 09/30/2013 [104791.682112] kernel: Call Trace:
[104791.682113] kernel: dump_stack+0x76/0x94
[104791.682116] kernel: bad_page.cold+0x9b/0xa0
[104791.682118] kernel: free_pcp_prepare+0x185/0x1c0
[104791.682121] kernel: free_unref_page_list+0xc1/0x1e0
[104791.682124] kernel: release_pages+0xe0/0x520
[104791.682129] kernel: tlb_flush_mmu+0x4b/0x150
[104791.682132] kernel: unmap_page_range+0xa5b/0xe30
[104791.682137] kernel: unmap_vmas+0x6a/0xd0
[104791.682140] kernel: exit_mmap+0x8e/0x1a0
[104791.682143] kernel: mmput+0x61/0x140
[104791.682146] kernel: begin_new_exec+0x4be/0xa30
[104791.682150] kernel: load_elf_binary+0x6f1/0x1640
[104791.682152] kernel: ? __kernel_read+0x18f/0x2b0
[104791.682154] kernel: ? __kernel_read+0x18f/0x2b0
[104791.682156] kernel: bprm_execve+0x26a/0x630
[104791.682159] kernel: do_execveat_common.isra.0+0x184/0x1c0
[104791.682162] kernel: __x64_sys_execve+0x33/0x40
[104791.682165] kernel: do_syscall_64+0x40/0x80
[104791.682167] kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[104791.682170] kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7fc32667e04b
[104791.682173] kernel: Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x7fc32667e021.
[104791.682174] kernel: RSP: 002b:00007fc30d3e4be8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: \
000000000000003b [104791.682176] kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 \
RCX: 00007fc32667e04b [104791.682177] kernel: RDX: 000006cc0060cfc0 RSI: \
000006cc0b87b2c0 RDI: 000006cc02226700 [104791.682178] kernel: RBP: 00007fc30d3e4c50 \
R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fc30d3e64d0 [104791.682179] kernel: R10: \
0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000006cc0b87b2c0 [104791.682180] kernel: \
R13: 000006cc0060cfc0 R14: 000006cc02226700 R15: 000006cc0b556720 [104791.697740] \
kernel: BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000625f9e74 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-1 \
[104791.697756] kernel: BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000625f9e74 \
type:MM_ANONPAGES val:1
Do you think that indicates a hardware problem?
> Even better is if you can reproduce the high load and try to capture
> one or more of the following: sysrq+l which will dump the result into
> dmesg and will end up in the journal, which you can filter similarly:
> journalctl -b -k -o short-monotonic --no-hostname > dmesg-
> cpustack.txt
I've no idea what caused the high load. I wasn't doing anything out of
the ordinary.
poc
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic