[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-list
Subject:    Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support
From:       Richard Kelsch <rich () csst ! net>
Date:       2005-07-02 0:53:23
Message-ID: 42C5E583.1080405 () csst ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

I mentioned them more than once, and even one of them in detail.  If 
you're going to flame, be accurate.

Les Mikesell wrote:

>On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 03:04, Richard Kelsch wrote:
>  
>
>>An OS with an open-source community can not be tied down at the whim
>>of a group of bearded men with a clean coding fetish.  It runs totally
>>counter to the idea of software from the community. 
>>    
>>
>
>Since you haven't, in all your ranting, mentioned a single specific
>bug that we might hope could be fixed and certainly not fixed by
>waiting, what is your suggestion to make things better here?  Fedora
>doesn't control the C language or gcc versions.  If those move in a way
>that breaks old stuff - or refuses to build old already-broken stuff,
>what do you expect a distribution on a fast release schedule to do?
>If you are going to criticize, be constructive.
>
>
>  
>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]