[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: fedora-list
Subject: Re: Some thoughts for the future
From: Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty () sbcglobal ! net>
Date: 2005-06-30 16:24:56
Message-ID: 42C41CD8.70404 () sbcglobal ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Mike McEldowney wrote:
>
>
> Mike McCarty wrote:
>
>> I agree with the sentiment about diversity. No one size fits all. I
>> like the
>> way Firefox is more adaptable than IE. More of the features can be
>> "customized". But you know something? Not all features even deserve
>> to exist. IMO, tabbed browsing is one of them. Not the best feature ever
>> dreamed up. I'd like all the features to be configurable, even
>> disableable.
>> It would be nice NOT TO HAVE TABS AT ALL.
>
>
>
> I myself LOVE tabs in my browser. I believe that tabbed browsing is
> one of the best features ever developed in a browser. I also use
> tabbed consoles extensively on my machine. Why would I want multiple
> windows of the same application taking up system resources when I can
> tab them and navigate faster with less system strain? Not to mention
> that when I want the console or browser out of the way to do something
> else, I don't have to minimize multiple windows, just one.
Did you read what I wrote? I am asking for more ability to customize.
And why should having multiple instances of an application running take
up more resources? I happen not to like tabbed browsing. You do.
Fine. How about a system that allows features to be disabled? Is that
too much to ask?
>
>> So, it seems to me, that your own prejudices are showing a little bit.
>
>
>
> <flame on>
>
> Really? And yours aren't? Customization allows us to change the
> software to meet our specific wants and prejudices.
I didn't say that mine weren't. Of course mine are.
>
> (snip)
>
>> I find that I'm frequently
>> accidentally doing things with the mouse because I can't just disable
>> "features".
>
>
>
> And I bet you would prefer your car ran on rails so that you'd stop
> running into things after you disable that stupid steering wheel.
Flames definitely not needed, appreciated, or useful.
>
> <flame off>
>
> All that said, I do agree that turning features off should also be an
> option. If you don't like tabs, you should be able to turn them off.
> If you don't want to click with your middle button, you should be able
> to turn it off. If you can program and can donate the time, you
> should consider helping add those options to those projects.
Hum. So. You flame me, but agree.
>
> Have a great day!
>
The sentiment seems a little hollow, given your tone.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic