[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-extras-list
Subject:    Re: Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2007-01-30
From:       Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael () gmx ! net>
Date:       2007-01-31 10:56:47
Message-ID: 20070131120234.ef6bd680.bugs.michael () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:50:10 +0100, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:

> isomMatt Domsch wrote:
> > Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 Tue Jan 30 08:12:14 CST 2007
> > 
> > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
> > 
> > Total packages: 2606
> > Number failed to build: 149
> > Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 20
> > Leaving:  129
> > (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
> > 
> > Of those expected to have worked...
> > Without a bug filed: 129
> > ----------------------------------
> (...)
> > isomaster-0.7-2.fc7.src.rpm	
> 
> There is a newer version of isomaster which compiled fine.
> 
> Should I remove old versions of a package somehow from rawhide?

Not necessary. They are deleted automatically with every *normal* push of
new packages. Unless that step is skipped. Then older package versions may
pile up for a few days before they are deleted.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]