[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-extras-list
Subject:    Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2007-01-30
From:       Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm () ATrpms ! net>
Date:       2007-01-30 19:24:30
Message-ID: 20070130192430.GC13890 () neu ! nirvana
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:14:11PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:04:12 +0100
> Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net (Axel Thimm) wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Tue Jan 30 08:16:22
> > > CST 2007
> > > 
> > > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
> > > 
> > > Total packages: 2606
> > > Number failed to build: 113
> > > Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 2
> > > Leaving:  111
> > > (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a
> > > package)
> > > 
> > > Of those expected to have worked...
> > > Without a bug filed: 111
> > 
> > I checked some of the packages assigned to myself and found that
> > xmlto/sgml-common currently fails in rawhide, so any package building
> > docs that way is currently breaking and giving false negatives.
> 
> Possibly this bug I filed last night? 
> Or related?
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225370

I think this must be the same issue, the error messages look very much
alike.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]