[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-directory-users
Subject:    Re: [389-users] stable packages for Centos 7
From:       Rich Megginson <rmeggins () redhat ! com>
Date:       2014-10-20 14:02:12
Message-ID: 544515E4.2070405 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 10/20/2014 04:48 AM, Angel Bosch wrote:
> can someone give me some light on this issue?
> 
> I'm getting some presure from my direct bosses and I need all info I can get to \
> evaluate our DS environment for next year.

There should be some pre-built and supported 389 packages available for 
EL7 around the RHEL 7.1 timeframe.

> 
> thanks in advance.
> 
> abosch
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Missatge original -----
> > De: "Angel Bosch" <abosch@ticmallorca.net>
> > Per: 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Enviats: Dimarts, 23 de Setembre 2014 13:05:33
> > Assumpte: stable packages for Centos 7
> > 
> > hi,
> > 
> > I'm planing to migrate some of my servers to 1.3 branch and I don't
> > know what packages to use.
> > 
> > I've found packages from mreynolds:
> > http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mreynolds/389-ds-base/
> > 
> > and dfas: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dfas/389-ds-dfas/
> > 
> > 
> > first one seems to be a nightly and I would like to mantain an stable
> > install. should I use dfas?
> > 
> > by the way, is the policy-packages situation going to be solved
> > anytime? I found very confusing having to deal with several repos to
> > get a full installation of 389 DS, and I though this spliting thing
> > was temporary just for EL6.
> > 
> > thanks for your time,
> > 
> > abosch
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > 
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]