[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-directory-users
Subject:    Re: [389-users] object with auxiliary object class only?
From:       Rich Megginson <rmeggins () redhat ! com>
Date:       2014-06-18 19:11:56
Message-ID: 53A1E47C.4000707 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 06/18/2014 11:07 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have accidentally created an object which has only auxiliary object 
> class, 389 allowed me to do it.
>
> version: 389-ds-base-1.3.2.16-20140526081843.fc20.x86_64
> from http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lkrispen/132test/
>
> LDIF I used:
>
> dn: ipaPublicKey=test,cn=keys,cn=sec,cn=dns,dc=ipa,dc=example
> changetype: add
> objectClass: ipaPublicKeyObject
> objectClass: top
> ipaPublicKey: test
>
>
> Schema:
> attributeTypes: (2.16.840.1.113730.3.8.11.53 NAME 'ipaPublicKey' DESC 
> 'Public key as DER-encoded SubjectPublicKeyInfo (RFC 5280)' EQUALITY 
> octetStringMatch SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.40 X-ORIGIN 'IPA v4' )
> objectClasses: (2.16.840.1.113730.3.8.12.24 NAME 'ipaPublicKeyObject' 
> DESC 'Wrapped public keys' SUP top AUXILIARY MAY ( ipaPublicKey ) 
> X-ORIGIN 'IPA v4' )
>
> Is it expected or should I open a ticket about it?
>
Seems wrong.  Please open a ticket.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]