[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-directory-users
Subject:    Re: [Fedora-directory-users] LDAP performances = databases
From:       Rich Megginson <rmeggins () redhat ! com>
Date:       2009-02-17 15:13:52
Message-ID: 499AD430.5070708 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Emmanuel BILLOT wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Since i'm triying to tune our FDS db, i wander if there is a maximum 
> number of entries per db.
Yes - about 2 billion (2^31)
> We've got 20.000 entries stored in 1 db and indexes seems to be well 
> configured, however a quite hard request (ldapsearch -x -h host-b 
> "dc=foo,dc=com" "(|(|(givenname=*doe*)(sn=*doe*)(uid=*doe*)))"
> has a quite slow result.
Make sure givenname, sn, and uid are indexed for substring.  You can use 
logconv.pl to see if you are getting any unindexed searches.  You might 
also need to increase your nsslapd-idlistscanlimit - see 
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/cli/8.0/Configuration_Command_File_Refer \
ence-Plug_in_Implemented_Server_Functionality_Reference-Database_Plug_in_Attributes.html

> 
> We use only one db in aim at keeping a simple replication schema.
> 
> Is there any limitation for databse entries ?
> Can we tune indexes for better results ?
> 
> BR,
> 


["smime.p7s" (application/x-pkcs7-signature)]

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]