[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-directory-devel
Subject:    =?utf-8?q?=5B389-devel=5D?= Porting Perl scripts
From:       Simon Pichugin <spichugi () redhat ! com>
Date:       2019-06-24 15:46:03
Message-ID: 20190624154603.GA28567 () spichugi ! usersys ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Hi team,
I am working on porting our admin Perl scripts to Python CLI.
Please, check the list and share your opinion:

- cl-dump.pl - dumps and decodes changelog. Is it used often (if at all)?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/ \
configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#cl_dump.pl_Dump_and_decode_changelog

- logconv.pl - parse and analise the access logs. Pretty big one, is it priority? How \
much people use it?  issue is created - https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50283
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#logconv_pl


- migrate.pl - which migration scenarios do we plan to support?
  Do we depricate old ones? Do we need the script?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#migrate-ds.pl


- ns_accountstatus.pl, ns_inactivate.pl, ns_activate.pl - the issue is
  discussed here - https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50206
  I think we should extend status at least. Also, William put there some
  of his thoughts. What do you think, guys? Will we refactor
  (kinda depricate) some "account lock" as William proposing?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/ \
configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#ldif2db.pl_Import-ns_accountstatus.pl_Establish_account_status


- syntax-validate.pl - it probably will go to 'healthcheck' tool
  issue is created - https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50173
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#syntax-validate.pl


- repl_monitor.pl - should we make it a part of 'healthcheck' too?
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html-single/ \
configuration_command_and_file_reference/index#repl_monitor.pl_Monitor_replication_status


Thanks,
Simon


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]