[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-directory-devel
Subject:    =?utf-8?q?=5B389-devel=5D?= Re: future of lib389 - seperate or merged?
From:       William Brown <wibrown () redhat ! com>
Date:       2017-08-23 4:42:11
Message-ID: 1503463331.5074.67.camel () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


> 
> -- Merging lib389 to 389-ds-base
> 
> One proposal is to merge them. We would mix in lib389 and the
> dirsrvtests into lib389 tests. It is often the case that lib389's
> features are bound tightly to a version of directory server.

Hi all,

This seems to be the most popular answer right now (and I support it
too, but I'm biased :) )

I'm going to open a ticket to 389-ds-base to suggest this is the course
of action we take.

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49363

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]