[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: convert everything to rpmautospec?
From:       Petr Pisar <ppisar () redhat ! com>
Date:       2024-04-09 12:20:37
Message-ID: ZhUylZHyThhVhlIL () dhcp-0-146 ! brq ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


V  Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 01:12:38PM -0500,  Michel Lind napsal(a):
> - should we update the packaging docs? Does this need to be a new Change
>   Proposal or does this just need to go through the Fedora packaging
>   committee? (Those involved in the Change like zbyszek can probably
>   advise here)
> 
FPC with an anouncement on devel list should be enough.

> - should we extend this further and say, if we no longer assume NEVRAs
>   are monotonically increasing in a new release, we should allow
>   packagers to use this opportunity to drop epochs in Rawhide? (likely
>   with proper announcement beforehand in devel@)
> 
Who will check reverse dependncies? E.g. perl will drop "Epoch: 4". Who will
check that no other package "Requires: perl > 4:..."? I remind that
fedora-ci.koji-build.rpmdeplint.functional gating test is still not enforced
globally.

-- Petr

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]