[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40
From:       Samuel Sieb <samuel () sieb ! net>
Date:       2024-02-24 9:12:36
Message-ID: 36607129-25d8-4a6d-80e5-fa8fc1f8aab9 () sieb ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2/24/24 00:47, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
>> On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
>>>>> On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> No match for group package "multican"
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WTH?
>>>>>
>>>>> It was a program for controlling Canon cameras that has been
>>>>> retired.
>>>>> Some group you have installed has that package listed in it.
>>>> Ah, this likely explains why neither "dnf repoquery" nor "dnf group
>>>> list" could find "multican".
>>>>
>>>>>   The comps
>>>>> groups need to be cleaned out and that's just a warning.
>>>> Well, ... IMHO, most about comps and groups is in an embarrassing
>>>> unusable shape.
>>>>
>>> No match for group package "baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts"
>> [snip]
>>> No match for group package "util-linux-user"
>>>
>>> I got these ones , is something on my rpm db ?
> 
> I am seeing these on another machine, too.

I expect you would see that on all machines.

>> No.  Well, sort of.  As mentioned, those are packages that have been 
>> removed from the distro, but are still listed in the comps groups.  
>> dnf checks the installed groups for packages that need to be updated 
>> and can't find these ones.
> Really? How do I check for which groups I have installed?
> 
> At least I haven't found any way to check for them, neither with rpm nor 
> with dnf.

dnf group list --installed

> Finally, another issue:
> ...
> Error:
>   Problem: conflicting requests
>    - package libva-intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.i686 from fedora 
> conflicts with intel-media-driver provided by 
> intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree
>    - package libva-intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from fedora 
> conflicts with intel-media-driver provided by 
> intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree
>    - problem with installed package intel-media-driver-23.4.3-1.fc39.x86_64
>    - intel-media-driver-23.4.3-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System  does not 
> belong to a distupgrade repository
> (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting 
> packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
> 
> I see 2 potential issues in there:
> 1. I think, I once "dnf swapped" these packages => Does "dnf 
> system-upgrade" handle "swapped" packages correctly?

How you installed the package is mostly irrelevant.  The package is 
installed, so it will get upgraded if possible.

> 2. Why does dnf system-upgrade wants to pull-in a i686 package in this 
> case? IMO, this doesn't make sense.

I'm unclear on which way the check is going.  Which package(s) do you 
have installed?

rpm -qa | grep intel-media
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]