[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)
From:       Fabio Valentini <decathorpe () gmail ! com>
Date:       2023-02-03 17:37:53
Message-ID: CAB-QmhTn-=MkU4YsHt_oTEzV-rprNSAusBpjrnXg8RacKeknrg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:27 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I have just realized, that the rpmautospec is not documented in the
> guidelines (unless my search-fu is failing me). Therefore I consider it
> strange that we should go from "no documentation at all" to "use it by
> default". I don't think this is right.
>
> IOW why is it not documented yet as an optional feature?

Well ... because nobody has submitted any proposal of documenting this
to the Packaging Guidelines?

I put it on my TODO list to write up rpmautospec documentation for the
Packaging Guidelines a while ago ... but TODO list keeps growing and
less important things keep getting pushed to the bottom of the list.
:)

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]