[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: F38 proposal: Rpmautospec by Default (System-Wide Change proposal)
From:       Kalev Lember <kalevlember () gmail ! com>
Date:       2023-01-03 21:34:00
Message-ID: CAKp5aO7sAEucrr3jUjH8UwNHJMz17d8CA+dbESYf8i0Vvm3-Mw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:27 PM Otto Liljalaakso <otto.liljalaakso@iki.fi>
wrote:

> Kalev Lember kirjoitti 3.1.2023 klo 11.19:
> > We might need to update package maintainer documents to be clear about
> this
> > though, so that people know that they should use 'fedpkg srpm' and not
> > 'rpmbuild -bs'.
>
> In Package Maintainer Docs, we have just a single instance of rpmbuild
> usage, at Using the Koji Build System — Scratch Builds [1]. Everything
> else is fedpkg based already. I made a pull request to get rid of that
> single outlier [2].
>
> Did you have some other source of documentation in mind that would need
> more work?
>
> [1]:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Using_the_Koji_Build_System/#scratch_builds
> [2]:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/101


Awesome, thanks for doing that! No, I didn't have anything specific in
mind, so hopefully that was all there was to fix :)

-- 
Kalev

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:27 PM Otto Liljalaakso &lt;<a \
href="mailto:otto.liljalaakso@iki.fi">otto.liljalaakso@iki.fi</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid \
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Kalev Lember kirjoitti 3.1.2023 klo 11.19:<br>&gt; \
We might need to update package maintainer documents to be clear about this<br> &gt; \
though, so that people know that they should use &#39;fedpkg srpm&#39; and not<br> \
&gt; &#39;rpmbuild -bs&#39;.<br> <br>
In Package Maintainer Docs, we have just a single instance of rpmbuild <br>
usage, at Using the Koji Build System — Scratch Builds [1]. Everything <br>
else is fedpkg based already. I made a pull request to get rid of that <br>
single outlier [2].<br>
<br>
Did you have some other source of documentation in mind that would need <br>
more work?<br>
<br>
[1]: <br>
<a href="https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Using_the_Koji_Build_System/#scratch_builds" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Using_the_Koji_Build_System/#scratch_builds</a><br>
 [2]: <a href="https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/101" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/101</a></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Awesome, \
thanks for doing that! No, I didn&#39;t have anything specific in mind, so hopefully \
that was all there was to fix :)</div><div><br></div><div>--  \
</div><div>Kalev</div></div></div>


[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]