[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (Syst
From:       Neal Gompa <ngompa13 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2022-05-29 6:22:45
Message-ID: CAEg-Je8H5qvLuhWV8-XRhjMOn8ggzr7AHV=-J1DwfRkMYwyChg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 2:57 AM Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 May 2022 20:52:51 +0200, you wrote:
>
> >On 28/05/2022 19:31, drago01 wrote:
> >> That's incorrect. They can be outdated, but there is no inherit reason
> >> why they have to be.
> >
> >Most upstreams don't care about bundled libraries. They bundle them once
> >and then forget.
>
> But most != all as you claimed.
>
> There is no indication that the JDK is such a thing - in fact given
> the packagers are struggling that is a good indication that the JDK is
> being regularly updated.

It could also imply the opposite (that is, the bundled libraries are
*not* being updated), if TCK failures are occurring simply because
we're dynamically linking those libraries.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]