[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (Syst
From:       Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour () gmail ! com>
Date:       2022-05-25 22:02:27
Message-ID: d58f2274-fbfe-3a08-ad63-bfc99c4faa88 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 5/25/22 13:49, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> The rename will really not help.

If it is not possible to ship an uncertified version then OpenJDK is
not free software and Fedora should not have it at all, in which
case the whole discussion is moot.  Otherwise, it is possible
to ship a compatible version without the trademarks and without
TCK certification.  IANAL, but I believe APIs are not eligible for
trademark protection, so Fedora would only need to change the stuff
that is *not* part of the API.
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]