[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: btrfs and default page sizes (4k vs 64k)
From:       Neal Gompa <ngompa13 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2020-09-16 18:27:44
Message-ID: CAEg-Je9V3S4P5TUPE2Ezw1K68J955OVsqXtz=5c1JmGVR5+Y4g () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 2:15 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:09:42PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I'm annoyed in general that we still have problems like this, and I'm
> > even more annoyed that I basically have no way to even test or deal
> > with these things. We *still* do not have packager test machines, so I
> > can't even figure out how to craft a workaround if there is one (and I
> > suspect one is possible).
>
> QEMU can emulate a virtual machine for any of the Fedora arches. It won't
> be fast like native, but that shouldn't be a fundamental blocker for a
> bit of adhoc debugging / testing of something that isn't performance
> critical.
>

Right, though on my Fedora 32 machine I can't create btrfs volumes in
QEMU. That's fixed in F33, but my machine that ran F33 kinda died last
week. :(

I guess I'll upgrade one of the machines hanging around...




--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]