[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: fedora-devel-list
Subject: Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved
From: Ed Greshko <ed.greshko () greshko ! com>
Date: 2020-09-02 3:09:38
Message-ID: 81e204f2-248e-99ef-f78c-4b6d47808be8 () greshko ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 2020-09-02 11:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:51 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:21 PM John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@splentity.com> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:14:35 AM MST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:49 pm, John M. Harris Jr
>>>> <johnmh@splentity.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Michael,
>>>>>
>>>>> The file is /etc/nsswitch.conf.
>>>>
>>>> You're wasting everyone's time with these low-effort spam posts.
>>> I don't see how this could possibly be spam. This is where the file is, is it
>>> not?
>>>
>>>> Lest anyone become confused, there is a big warning at the top of that file
>>>> warning you that it is managed by authselect, and that manual changes
>>>> will be overwritten.
>>> I don't know what you're talking about here. Am I missing something? Is this a
>>> F33 Change? Exact content of my /etc/nsswitch:
>> Stated in the file or not, it is in fact edited by authconfig,
>> sometimes as part of RPM installation. Manual editing of it is not and
>> has never been stable without setting up some kind of configuration
>> management to restore RPM based modifications. Been there, done that,
>> with one of those 10-year solo admins who decided to hand-edit tweaks
>> but refused to permit management of the file.
>>
>> And oh, "files" always comes first because local config files should
>> always take priority over upstream network based services.
> authconfig is dead. But yes, nsswitch is managed by authselect.
>
I would state that slightly differently.
nsswitch.conf is now managed by authselect by default.
I say that since, as I've already mentioned, I have a F32 system which has been upgraded over time
from versions without authselect. The upgrade didn't changed that.
So, to become more conforming to current practice I did just run...
authselect select --force sssd
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic