[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: fedora-devel-list
Subject: Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
From: Miro_Hrončok <mhroncok () redhat ! com>
Date: 2020-05-12 9:49:52
Message-ID: febf8cd1-94af-eafb-e68e-8ea84d0abe3f () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 12. 05. 20 10:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Actually, it should be also useful if position of each abstaining FESCo
> member was explained. Because for myself, I can interpret 5 people
> abstaining just as a lack of understanding of the issue and nothing else.
For me, it was that. I wasn't able to grasp the change proposal quickly, would
need to dedicate more time to it and I prioritized other things, abstaining as
in: "I trust other members understand this issue better than me and they will
decide the good way."
However, it turned out that there was simply too many of 0 votes, hence I bit
the bullet and decided to vote in favor, trusting the change owners they know
what they are doing.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic