[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog
From:       Robbie Harwood <rharwood () redhat ! com>
Date:       2020-01-31 18:31:05
Message-ID: jlgo8ujeavq.fsf () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com> writes:

> Michal Konecny <mkonecny@redhat.com> wrote:
>> V=C3=ADt Ondruch wrote:
>>> Neal Gompa napsal(a):
>>>> Randy Barlow <bowlofeggs@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>>>> V=C3=ADt Ondruch wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> cough cough errata cough cough
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Honestly, sometimes the disconnect between what is going on in
>>>>>> Fedora and internally in Red Hat is intriguing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the idea of sharing code on one hand, but on the other hand
>>>>> it is pretty oriented towards workflows that are designed for a
>>>>> product release cycle. Bodhi is designed around community feedback
>>>>> (and now CI feedback).
>>>>>
>>>>> It could be interesting to hold a chat with the Errata tool
>>>>> developers to see if there is interest in sharing tooling, but it
>>>>> may be a lot of effort to make Errata tool flexible enough to
>>>>> support two pretty different workflows. I'd be willing to have
>>>>> that conversation; I could be wrong.
>>>
>>> Of course, there is a lot of business logic specific to Red Hat
>>> projects backed into Errata, but ultimately, it does not help to
>>> anybody if Fedora release process is using different tools then Red
>>> Hat internally.  What Red Hat does internally should be just
>>> extension to what Fedora does. The processes used internally should
>>> be proven in Fedora first.
>>
>> This is a very nice vision that will potentially make life of Red Hat
>> and Fedora much easier. I'm not that long in the Fedora project to
>> know, why Fedora and Red Hat internal tools are that different, but
>> this idea doesn't sound that bad. Few questions first: Are those
>> internal tools open source?  Could we as Fedora community use them?
>> Is there any legal issue?  Is this tool in good shape?
>>
>> And talking about the git forge, what is Red Hat using internally as
>> git forge? And then the above questions applies.
>
> It was mentioned in a different part of this thread that Red Hat is
> using pagure internally.

Using, not standardized on.  It depends on the team.

Thanks,
--Robbie

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]