[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
From:       "John M. Harris Jr" <johnmh () splentity ! com>
Date:       2019-11-20 21:10:25
Message-ID: 28635187.rxNAHYmoXV () marvin ! jharris ! pw
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 3:52:27 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote:
> If you start fidling with things in PATH, you have the problem of SCL. And
> as you wrote, SCL is terrible. And that was the reason why we have
> modularity: We do not want to relocate code to non-standard paths.

I may be a bit confused here, but I thought Modularity was not a replacement 
for SCLs? Clearly, it can't be, it doesn't provide even similar 
functionality.. With SCLs, as annoying as they are, you do get parallel 
installations, which Modularity cannot provide.

If parallel availability, without parallel installation, is all you want, I 
can show you how to do that with RPM right now, no Modularity required.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]