[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: Modularity and the system-upgrade path
From:       Petr Pisar <ppisar () redhat ! com>
Date:       2019-11-19 11:55:14
Message-ID: slrnqt7m12.6pv.ppisar () dhcp-0-146 ! brq ! redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 2019-11-19, Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Yes, but what you have described is basically to create 2 streams of
> perl-Sys-Virt module. Which is probably not what normal people want.

Having two different perl-Sys-Virt packages was requesed by
Daniel. That was not my choice.

> Creating module for one package is the worst idea ever.
>
Matter of opinion.

> Sure, bundling perl-Sys-Virt into the libvirt module would solve the
> problem, but then what's the point of modules? You will be building
> libvirt itself then multiple times due to the stream expansion.
> 
Then put perl-Sys-Virt into a separat module.

And please to do not top-post.

-- Petr
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]