[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides
From:       Susi Lehtola <jussilehtola () fedoraproject ! org>
Date:       2015-06-15 22:28:19
Message-ID: 557F5183.1070906 () fedoraproject ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 06/12/2015 06:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 06/11/2015 10:01 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> So, whose fault is this? Packaging of dnf? Nothing relevant for this
>> caught my eye skimming through the packaging guidelines.
>>
>> And related: trying to install some $pkg-openmpi package, I don't
>> generally see packages enforcing that the -openmpi version of some
>> dependency library is installed as opposed to just the regular libs
>> package. Should such requires need to be stated explicitly?
>
> MPI packages need to filter out the provides from the MPI versions and
> explicitly add needed requires on the specific MPI flavors of packages
> needed.  This probably needs to be added to the MPI guidelines.

Yes, a mention of filtering should be added. Basically, this is already 
discussed in

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering
-- 
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola@fedoraproject.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]