[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: fedora-devel-list
Subject: Re: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides
From: Radek Holy <rholy () redhat ! com>
Date: 2015-06-12 8:28:30
Message-ID: 1261771877.14695014.1434097710461.JavaMail.zimbra () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sandro Mani" <manisandro@gmail.com>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:01:12 PM
> Subject: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides
> Hello,
> Investigating bug #1230838, I noticed that when installing mmg3d-libs, dnf
> installs Konsole output ptscotch-mpich, whereas yum-deprecated installs
> scotch. Both scotch and ptscotch-mpich provide the required
> libscotch.so.0()(64bit), albeit one in /usr/lib64/ and the other one in
> /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/:
> $ dnf repoquery --requires mmg3d-libs
> [...]
> libscotch.so.0()(64bit)
> libscotcherr.so.0()(64bit)
> [...]
> $ dnf provides 'libscotch.so.0()(64bit)'
> ptscotch-mpich-6.0.4-2.fc23.x86_64 : PT-Scotch libraries compiled against
> mpich
> Repo : rawhide
> ptscotch-openmpi-6.0.4-2.fc23.x86_64 : PT-Scotch libraries compiled against
> openmpi
> Repo : rawhide
> scotch-6.0.4-2.fc23.x86_64 : Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library
> Repo : rawhide
> Konsole output $ dnf repoquery -l scotch.x86_64 | grep libscotch.so.0
> /usr/lib64/libscotch.so.0
> /usr/lib64/libscotch.so.0.2
> Konsole output $ dnf repoquery -l ptscotch-mpich.x86_64 | grep libscotch.so.0
> /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libscotch.so.0
> /usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libscotch.so.0.2
> $ dnf install mmg3d-libs
> [...]
> Installing:
> environment-modules x86_64 3.2.10-14.fc23 rawhide 117 k
> hwloc-libs x86_64 1.10.1-2.fc23 rawhide 1.3 M
> lzma-libs x86_64 4.32.7-13.fc22 rawhide 38 k
> mmg3d-libs x86_64 4.0.2-1.fc23 rawhide 211 k
> mpich x86_64 3.1.4-3.fc23 rawhide 1.1 M
> ptscotch-mpich
> $ yum-deprecated install mmg3d-libs
> [...]
> Installing:
> mmg3d-libs x86_64 4.0.2-1.fc23 rawhide 211 k
> Installing for dependencies:
> lzma-libs x86_64 4.32.7-13.fc22 rawhide 38 k
> scotch
> So, whose fault is this? Packaging of dnf? Nothing relevant for this caught
> my eye skimming through the packaging guidelines.
> And related: trying to install some $pkg-openmpi package, I don't generally
> see packages enforcing that the -openmpi version of some dependency library
> is installed as opposed to just the regular libs package. Should such
> requires need to be stated explicitly?
> Thanks,
> Sandro
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
If a package "Requires: foo" and both "bar" and "barbaz" "Provides: foo", they are \
handled as being equally suitable. DNF/libsolv is not going to prefer packages with \
shorter names.
--
Radek Holý
Associate Software Engineer
Software Management Team
Red Hat Czech
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<html><body><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; \
font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div><br></div><div><br></div><hr \
id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid \
#1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:norm \
al;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: \
</b>"Sandro Mani" <manisandro@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"Development discussions \
related to Fedora" <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, \
June 11, 2015 6:01:12 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi \
having same provides<br><div><br></div>
Hello,<br>
<br>
Investigating bug #1230838, I noticed that when installing
mmg3d-libs, dnf installs
<title>Konsole output</title>
ptscotch-mpich, whereas yum-deprecated installs scotch. Both scotch
and ptscotch-mpich provide the required libscotch.so.0()(64bit),
albeit one in /usr/lib64/ and the other one in
/usr/lib64/mpich/lib/:<br>
<br>
$ dnf repoquery --requires mmg3d-libs<br>
[...]<br>
libscotch.so.0()(64bit)<br>
libscotcherr.so.0()(64bit)<br>
[...]<br>
<br>
<br>
$ dnf provides 'libscotch.so.0()(64bit)'<br>
ptscotch-mpich-6.0.4-2.fc23.x86_64 : PT-Scotch libraries compiled
against mpich<br>
Repo : rawhide<br>
<br>
ptscotch-openmpi-6.0.4-2.fc23.x86_64 : PT-Scotch libraries compiled
against openmpi<br>
Repo : rawhide<br>
<br>
scotch-6.0.4-2.fc23.x86_64 : Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning
library<br>
Repo : rawhide<br>
<br>
<br>
<title>Konsole output</title>
$ dnf repoquery -l scotch.x86_64 | grep libscotch.so.0<br>
/usr/lib64/libscotch.so.0<br>
/usr/lib64/libscotch.so.0.2
<br>
<br>
<br>
<title>Konsole output</title>
$ dnf repoquery -l ptscotch-mpich.x86_64 | grep libscotch.so.0<br>
/usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libscotch.so.0<br>
/usr/lib64/mpich/lib/libscotch.so.0.2<br>
<br>
<br>
$ dnf install mmg3d-libs<br>
[...]<br>
Installing:<br>
environment-modules \
x86_64
3.2.10-14.fc23 \
rawhide \
117 k<br> hwloc-libs   \
; \
x86_64
1.10.1-2.fc23 \
rawhide \
1.3 M<br> lzma-libs \
\
x86_64
4.32.7-13.fc22 \
rawhide \
38 k<br> mmg3d-libs \
\
x86_64
4.0.2-1.fc23 \
rawhide \
211 k<br> mpich &nbs \
p; \
x86_64
3.1.4-3.fc23 \
rawhide \
1.1 M<br> ptscotch-mpich <br>
<br>
$ yum-deprecated install mmg3d-libs<br>
[...]<br>
Installing:<br>
mmg3d-libs \
x86_64
4.0.2-1.fc23 \
rawhide \
211 k<br>
Installing for dependencies:<br>
lzma-libs \
x86_64
4.32.7-13.fc22 \
rawhide \
38 k<br>
scotch<br>
<br>
<br>
So, whose fault is this? Packaging of dnf? Nothing relevant for this
caught my eye skimming through the packaging guidelines.<br>
<br>
And related: trying to install some $pkg-openmpi package, I don't
generally see packages enforcing that the -openmpi version of some
dependency library is installed as opposed to just the regular libs
package. Should such requires need to be stated explicitly?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Sandro<br>
<br>-- <br>devel mailing \
list<br>devel@lists.fedoraproject.org<br>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel<br>Fedora \
Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct</blockquote><div><br>If a \
package "Requires: foo" and both "bar" and "barbaz" "Provides: foo", they are handled \
as being equally suitable. DNF/libsolv is not going to prefer packages with shorter \
names.<br></div><div>-- <br></div><div><span name="x"></span>Radek Holý<br>Associate \
Software Engineer<br>Software Management Team<br>Red Hat Czech<span \
name="x"></span><br></div></div></body></html>
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic