[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: Proposal to (formally/easily) allowing multiple versions of the same library installable
From:       Reindl Harald <h.reindl () thelounge ! net>
Date:       2015-02-14 3:59:16
Message-ID: 54DEC814.1000605 () thelounge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am 13.02.2015 um 21:42 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
> I'm not sure if things will be (much) worse than the current situation.
> Maintainers already do maintain multiple versions of the same library,
> and also the upgrade path from a Fedora release to the next should work.
> My assumption was that the effort needed to properly package libfoo3 for
> F21, is not more than what is already needed when you package it for
> Rawhide/F22

but you miss that in Rawhide *only that* version is packaged and any 
other package is linked aganst *that one* so there are no collisions and 
dependecie issues possible

haveing the same library in different versions in the same release is a 
complete other world and at the end not maintainable


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]