[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: Obsoleting ConsoleKit once and for all
From:       Kevin Fenzi <kevin () scrye ! com>
Date:       2013-07-31 19:00:52
Message-ID: 20130731130052.664dc77e () jelerak ! scrye ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:28:55 +0200
Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@gmail.com> wrote:

> Am Montag, den 29.07.2013, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Sun, 28.07.13 13:24, Christoph Wickert
> > (christoph.wickert@gmail.com) wrote:
> > 
> > > and by pcmamfm and thunar for
> > > handling permissions of removable devices.
> > 
> > I don't know what "pcmamfm" and "thunar" are, but why would they use
> > ConsoleKit for that? Can you elaborate?
> 
> thunar and pcmanfm are file managers and require ConsoleKit for
> handling removable storage.

I'm traveling right now so don't have time to look, but are you sure
this is still the case for Thunar? I see no deps, no ck-* functions, and
everything seems to work fine here with no ConsoleKit installed. 

I'll try and investigate more in the next few days when I am back home. 

kevin

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]