[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: Testing libsatsolver on Fedora
From:       Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar () redhat ! com>
Date:       2009-07-31 16:24:26
Message-ID: 20090731162426.GG12281 () localhost
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 09:12:23AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 17:41 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > Right, I meant conflicts between latest versions of packages in
> > all repositories.
> 
> We have that too, for the packages that explicitly mark themselves as
> conflicting.  We don't catch unmarked file conflicts until we've
> downloaded and attempt to install, and then it's caught by rpm.  Lots of
> multilib file coloring magic here.

Ok, I thought we have a policy that forbids it. So there is actually a
good reason why it should be supported by yum.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]