[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: Encrypted home directory
From:       nodata <lsof () nodata ! co ! uk>
Date:       2008-12-30 19:20:38
Message-ID: 1230664838.29687.1.camel () sb-home
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Sonntag, den 21.12.2008, 12:30 -0600 schrieb Eric Sandeen:
> eCryptfs is still somewhat fragile at times; under constrained usecases
> it's reasonably ok but if you stray from that things can go badly...
> The stuff Ubuntu has done is interesting but I'm wondering if anyone
> there has really given the kernelspace side a good workout.  (I've
> worked on eCryptfs a lot, and it's pretty nifty, but there are still
> some kinks to work out).

Yes, filenames are not encrypted. Maybe this matters, maybe not.
customer-name-finances.odt might be quite a private filename..

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]