[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: rsyslog is in F8
From:       Leszek Matok <Lam () Lam ! pl>
Date:       2007-07-20 19:02:04
Message-ID: 20070720210204.08513649 () pensja ! lam ! pl
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Dnia 2007-07-21, o godz. 00:17:57 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@fedoraproject.org>
napisaƂ(a):

> Not really. Rsyslog might switch a new format in the future. Look in the 
> upstream list archives for details.
Are they willing to forcibly break compatibility with previous versions?
Aren't they going to provide a nice path of upgrade (a converter, accepting
both formats)? Is it going to happen before F8?

If all three answers are "no", then I don't see any reason to rename
syslog.conf.

If any of the first two answers is "yes", many of us won't see any reason to
really obsolete sysklogd with rsyslog instead of syslog-ng or anything other.

Lam

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic