[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: rsyslog is in F8
From:       Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip () kanarip ! com>
Date:       2007-07-19 14:50:30
Message-ID: 469F7A36.80606 () kanarip ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 02:45:11PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> Why does rsyslogd have to obsolete syslogd?
> 
> That's easy -- because it does. The original syslogd is no longer in
> development.
> 

Right, I figured it would be something like syslogd being discontinued.
On the other hand, it's been reasonably quiet for like 6 years.

Please don't understand me wrong here, I do get the idea of why Fedora
has to replace sysklogd for another package in whatever it releases and
maintains. +1 to that.

Nonetheless, my stupid question was about why it has to, immediately,
explicitly,  obsolete sysklogd, leaving "no" choice to continue using
sysklogd. Do they conflict if only installed on the same system, in a
way that can't be fixed?

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]