[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: High Performance SSH/SCP - HPN-SSH
From:       Josh Boyer <jwboyer () jdub ! homelinux ! org>
Date:       2007-07-13 1:02:43
Message-ID: 1184288563.17091.3.camel () vader ! jdub ! homelinux ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 00:59 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Steve G <linux_4ever <at> yahoo.com> writes:
> > Not unless upstream takes it. The Fedora merge did not happen so that we
> > don't have to work with upstream anymore. We should never think about putting
> > a patch in Fedora first and then seeing if upstream takes it.
> 
> Fedora ships and has always shipped plenty of patches. It not being upstream is 
> definitely an argument against shipping it, but there might be reasons why 
> shipping it is a net win after all.
> 
> Also, if upstream isn't willing to merge patches, it might even make sense to 
> fork the project.

Please don't use the 'f' word lightly.  Forking is the exact opposite
goal of Fedora.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]