[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fedora-devel-list
Subject:    Re: The updates firehose
From:       Jesse Keating <jkeating () redhat ! com>
Date:       2007-06-11 16:04:07
Message-ID: 200706111204.08020.jkeating () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Monday 11 June 2007 11:56:21 Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Fortunately, not many things require metacity, and chances are that the
> user isn't going to install it post facto since we install firstboot by
> default which has an explicit metacity requirement.

The way it came to my attention was somebody trying to use pungi to respin 
Fedora.  Depsolving brought in all the -devel stuff.  Perhaps this is also a 
result of how pungi is doing the depsolving as it has to do it differently 
than one would do at install time.  (IE I can't rely on the metacity already 
in the transaction to satisfy a dep of something else as that user may not 
actually select metacity, I need to pull in all possible providers of a dep 
and have anaconda/yum sort it out at install time based on the packages 
selected then).

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic