[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: fedora-devel-list
Subject: Re: The updates firehose
From: Jesse Keating <jkeating () redhat ! com>
Date: 2007-06-11 16:04:07
Message-ID: 200706111204.08020.jkeating () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]
On Monday 11 June 2007 11:56:21 Christopher Aillon wrote:
> Fortunately, not many things require metacity, and chances are that the
> user isn't going to install it post facto since we install firstboot by
> default which has an explicit metacity requirement.
The way it came to my attention was somebody trying to use pungi to respin
Fedora. Depsolving brought in all the -devel stuff. Perhaps this is also a
result of how pungi is doing the depsolving as it has to do it differently
than one would do at install time. (IE I can't rely on the metacity already
in the transaction to satisfy a dep of something else as that user may not
actually select metacity, I need to pull in all possible providers of a dep
and have anaconda/yum sort it out at install time based on the packages
selected then).
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic