[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fdo-internals
Subject:    [fdo-internals] Re: FDO provider conformance test
From:       Jackie Ng <jumpinjackie () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-08-05 1:57:56
Message-ID: 1280973476094-5375059.post () n2 ! nabble ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


Hi Haris,

I like this idea. I've done my fair share of provider-specific workarounds,
most involving:

 1. Advertised capabilities not lining up with actual behaviour
 2. Inconsistent schema/class naming. Inability to derive physical element
name from logical element name in a consistent manner.
 3. Missing capabilities (like support for batch inserts and support for
schema/class attributes)

A test suite that catches these things would be very useful.

- Jackie

-- 
View this message in context: \
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/FDO-provider-conformance-test-tp5372161p5375059.html
 Sent from the FDO Internals mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]