[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fdo-internals
Subject:    [fdo-internals] subversion branches
From:       greg.boone () autodesk ! com (Greg Boone)
Date:       2007-02-22 16:11:10
Message-ID: 4187BAA24A3D094F925AEE0BE39B7077058609A6 () msgusaemb01 ! autodesk ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

The following branches/tags have been removed. 

(Refer to http://trac.osgeo.org/fdo/ticket/19 for full details)

svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/branches/3.2.x  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/branches/3.2.0  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G021  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G026  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G029  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G030  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G031  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G033  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G034  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G035  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G036  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdo/tags/3.2.x_G037  
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdogdal/trunk
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdowfs/trunk
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdowms/trunk
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdosdf/trunk
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdoshp/trunk
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdordbms/trunk
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdoarcsde/trunk
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdocore/trunk
svn remove https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdoogr/trunk


-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Greg Boone
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:39 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: RE: [fdo-internals] subversion branches

Frank,

I will take of removing the unused branches/trunks.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:fdo-internals-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bray
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 2:35 PM
To: FDO Internals Mail List
Subject: Re: [fdo-internals] subversion branches

I am strongly in favour of removing the defunct trunks and branches. 
Getting rid of them makes the bad situation easier to understand and 
lessens the potential for something getting checked into the wrong
place.

Bob

Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Greg Boone wrote:
>> Frank's analysis is correct. 
>>
>> The trunks of the following repositories are no longer used
>>
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/fdocore
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/sdf
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/shp
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/wfs
>> https://svn.osgeo.org/svn/wms
>> etc...
>>
>> As for removing the trunks of the subversions listed above, is there
any
>> drawbacks to doing so? I would like feedback on this by other PSC
>> members.
> 
> Thanks Greg for the confirmation!
> 
> +1 for removal motion
> 
> 
>> As well, the 3.2.0 and 3.2.x branches of the newly merged fdo
repository
>> are misleading and no longer required. I am in favour or removing
them. 
> 
> +1 too
> 
> 
> Cheers
_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

_______________________________________________
fdo-internals mailing list
fdo-internals@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/fdo-internals

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]