[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       fault-injection-developer
Subject:    RE: [Fault-injection-developer] RE: [DISCUSSION] make decisions a
From:       "Gao, Kevin" <kevin.gao () intel ! com>
Date:       2003-01-10 2:53:56
[Download RAW message or body]

Oh, that is a bug, I have submitted it into sourceforge.net,

I means remove driver before remove triggers, sorry for confusion :-)

-Kevin


-----Original Message-----
From: Lynch, Rusty 
Sent: 2003?1?10? 9:47
To: Gao, Kevin; Wang, Stanley; Zhuang, Louis; 'Rusty Lynch';
'fault-injection-developer@lists.sourceforge.net'
Cc: Wang, Frank
Subject: RE: [Fault-injection-developer] RE: [DISCUSSION] make decisions
about ficl


> From: Gao, Kevin [mailto:kevin.gao@intel.com] 
<snip>
> 2)Need discussion.
> 
> I think locking modules is very dirty way, and make user feel not
> comfortable.
> But the problem is that, user always forgets to remove 
> trigger before remove
> interceptor, and make system oops. Is there any method to solve this
> problem.
> The problem worried us since the early time of FITH, I hope 
> we can solve it
> thoroughly.
> 

Is this really still a problem with our current design for interceptors
and triggers?  Can you give a list of steps with our current code to 
cause a box to oops?

    -rustyl



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Fault-injection-developer mailing list
Fault-injection-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fault-injection-developer
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]