[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       f-spot-list
Subject:    Re: How dead is f-spot
From:       Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam () whitemice ! org>
Date:       2016-01-05 14:53:37
Message-ID: 1452005617.3640.6.camel () whitemice ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 15:03 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 13:52 -0500, Jack wrote: =

> > Gentoo just marked f-spot as dead with the comment "Dead for 4
> > years,=A0=A0
> > relies on obsolete lcms, bundles a lot of libs.=A0=A0Removal in a
> > month."
> There was work on the LCMS dependency.=A0=A0I'm not sure where that ended
> up.
> It still works well for me, but yeah... someday.

I've converted to Shotwell. =A0With this version [0.22.0-1.4.x86_64] it
has worked well and the import was flawless. =A0Duplicate detection seems
effective, tags were preserved. and the library monitoring is really
nice.

> Do any of the alternatives support hierarchical tagging like f-spot
> does?=A0=A0Last I looked shotwell[*1] did not.

It does

> I would like something GNOMEish that fits nicely in the GNOME
> environment.
> [*1]=A0=A0And I'm still a bit bitter about the whole Shotwell thing -
> when they could have just contributed to an existing application].

-- =

Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awilliam@whitemice.org> GPG D95ED383
Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA


_______________________________________________
f-spot-list mailing list
f-spot-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]