[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: f-spot-list
Subject: Re: How dead is f-spot
From: kenneth.westelinck () telenet ! be
Date: 2014-12-09 11:28:11
Message-ID: 420607777.11542065.1418124491479.JavaMail.root () telenet ! be
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Digikam also does hierarchical tagging. f-spot has been a fine and mature product, \
but as my photo collection grew, I started to experience instability problems and \
crashes. That's why I am now on Digikam. I also preferred f-spot, however.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dougie Nisbet" <dougie@highmoor.co.uk>
To: awilliam@whitemice.org
Cc: f-spot-list@gnome.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 12:22:51 PM
Subject: Re: How dead is f-spot
On 8 December 2014 at 20:03, Adam Tauno Williams < awilliam@whitemice.org > wrote:
Do any of the alternatives support hierarchical tagging like f-spot
does? Last I looked shotwell[*1] did not.
Shotwell does hierarchical tagging.
I've rather reluctantly moved from f-spot to shotwell. I was happy with f-spot and \
didn't mind the lack of development seeing it more as a mature product. The problem \
for me was instability and crashes. shotwell is ok but I preferred f-spot.
Dougie
_______________________________________________
f-spot-list mailing list
f-spot-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<html><body><div style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt; color: \
#000000"><div>Digikam also does hierarchical tagging. f-spot has been a fine and \
mature product, but as my photo collection grew, I started to experience instability \
problems and crashes. That's why I am now on Digikam. I also preferred f-spot, \
however.</div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr"><div \
style="color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;" \
data-mce-style="color: #000; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; \
text-decoration: none; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: \
12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Dougie Nisbet" <dougie@highmoor.co.uk><br><b>To: \
</b>awilliam@whitemice.org<br><b>Cc: </b>f-spot-list@gnome.org<br><b>Sent: \
</b>Tuesday, December 9, 2014 12:22:51 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: How dead is \
f-spot<br><div><br></div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On 8 December 2014 at 20:03, Adam Tauno Williams <span \
dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:awilliam@whitemice.org" target="_blank" \
data-mce-href="mailto:awilliam@whitemice.org">awilliam@whitemice.org</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex" data-mce-style="margin: 0 0 0 .8ex; border-left: 1px \
#ccc solid; padding-left: 1ex;"><div id=":4xw" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden" \
data-mce-style="overflow: hidden;">Do any of the alternatives support hierarchical \
tagging like f-spot<br> does? Last I looked shotwell[*1] did \
not.<br></div></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div></div><div \
class="gmail_extra">Shotwell does hierarchical tagging. <br><div><br></div></div><div \
class="gmail_extra">I've rather reluctantly moved from f-spot to shotwell. I was \
happy with f-spot and didn't mind the lack of development seeing it more as a mature \
product. The problem for me was instability and crashes. shotwell is ok but I \
preferred f-spot.<br><div><br></div></div><div \
class="gmail_extra">Dougie<br></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>f-spot-list \
mailing list<br>f-spot-list@gnome.org<br>https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list<br></div><div><br></div></div></body></html>
_______________________________________________
f-spot-list mailing list
f-spot-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic