[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       exim-users
Subject:    [exim] exim-4.50 or exim-4.44+exiscan vs mimedefang and useful
From:       Bob Tanner <tanner () real-time ! com>
Date:       2005-03-07 19:48:45
Message-ID: 200503071348.46735 () www ! mn-linux ! org ! or ! transmuter ! real-time ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Using exim-4.50 or exim-4.44+exiscan all I seem to be able to get out of 
spamassassin is the following:

X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system 
"mycomputer.company.com", has identified this incoming email as possible 
spam.  The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if 
it isn't spam) or label <snip>

It's adequate, but compare to the mimedefang report:

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) comp.company.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled
        version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Report:
        *  0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
        *      [score: 0.5000] <snip>

Many more details. Make troubleshooting and supporting far flung MTAs easier 
when you get this info in the headers.

Is there anyway to get more spamassassin info out of exim-4.50 or 
exim-4.44+exiscan?

-- 
Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>          | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com, Minnesota, Linux | Fax   : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42  1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]