[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: evms-devel
Subject: Re: [Evms-devel] BBR Feature Problem?
From: Jake Colman <colman () ppllc ! com>
Date: 2002-10-24 14:13:04
[Download RAW message or body]
Kevin,
I'm sorry to cop-out on this, but I needed to get my drives up and running.
I removed the BBR feature, recreated the volumes, and began moving my data
around.
I generally try to do a better job assisting in beta testing but, this time
around, I had to move on and can no longer reproduce the problem.
...Jake
KC> On Wednesday 23 October 2002 09:02, Jake Colman wrote:
>> I created an evms volume with an ext3 filesystem and added the BBR
>> feature to it. I mounted the evms partition on /mnt and copied data
>> from a non-evms partition to the evms partition. I them unmounted the
>> old partition and manually mounted the evms partition in its place.
>> All was well. I then edited /etc/fstab to make these changes
>> permanent.
>>
>> Upon reboot, the kernel consistently paniced with an assertion failure
>> in transaction.c, a problem with the ext3 journal file.
>>
>> I recreated the evms partition without the BBR feature, redid the same
>> steps and all is now well.
>>
>> I know that ext3 filesystems on evms volumes has been extensively
>> tested. Has the BBR feature been similarly tested in this type of
>> situation or is it still beta quality?
KC> Hi Jake,
KC> I have just run a similar test on one of my machines. I created a
KC> segment, added BBR, and mkfs'd with ext3. I copied the contents of
KC> /var to the volume, and added the volume to /etc/fstab to mount over
KC> /var. I rebooted and everything seems to come up fine with the BBR
KC> volume mounted.
KC> Now granted, I'm not running a lot of services on this machine, so
KC> there isn't a whole lot of activity happening on that volume. But
KC> based on your email, it seems like the problem is happening
KC> immediately. Can you give me an idea of what apps/services are
KC> accessing that volume?
KC> You said in a previous email that you ran this test using /var. Have
KC> you tried this with other mount points? If so, are you getting the
KC> same errors?
KC> Do you know where in transaction.c the assertion is failing? Which
KC> line? I can try to add breakpoints in my debugger to see if my
KC> machine is even going near that code path.
KC> --
KC> Kevin Corry
KC> corryk@us.ibm.com
KC> http://evms.sourceforge.net/
--
Jake Colman
Principia Partners LLC Phone: (201) 209-2467
Harborside Financial Center Fax: (201) 946-0320
902 Plaza Two E-mail: colman@ppllc.com
Jersey City, NJ 07311 www.principiapartners.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4729346;7592162;s?http://www.sun.com/javavote
_______________________________________________
Evms-devel mailing list
Evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/evms-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic