[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: et-mgmt-tools
Subject: Re: [et-mgmt-tools] %include
From: Michael DeHaan <mdehaan () redhat ! com>
Date: 2007-07-30 20:14:15
Message-ID: 46AE4697.9060203 () redhat ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
drew einhorn wrote:
>
>
> If 0.6.0 is likely in a couple weeks, I have no need for an 0.5.2
There's definitely a need for the 0.5 branch. Testing. Bug
reports. Helping 0.6.0 be a better release. If no one
uses source/testing releases, releases will go a lot slower.
If you're willing to try out 0.5.x/source now, you should continue to
use it, and the changes coming in 0.6.0 will be very very
slight. You'll have a leg up, even.
>
> >
> > I've cobbled together my own .rpm packages
> > using the latest source from git
> >
> > I think they have some minor problems
> > bad %files section
> This may already be corrected upstream. Depends when your
> checkout was.
> >
>
>
> You don't realize what I did.
> I expanded the latest source rpms I could find, 0.5.1
> think .spec file in the download directory was a bit newer
> took the source code from git
> mashed it all together and built an rpm
yeah, the spec file is in git and "make" is set to use that
automagically.
>
> Think to get it right all I would need to fix the %files section
>
> There may be other more subtle problems.
> I don't know!
>
> I'll be glad when I have something I have a bit more faith in.
"make" straight out of the source checkout builds RPMs.
They will build just like they do on anyone else's box.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic