[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       enlightenment-users
Subject:    Re: [e-users] Really Need Proper Build system for Enlightenment ( E17 )
From:       P Purkayastha <ppurka () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-03-25 7:02:52
Message-ID: 9780297.1927.1332658972149.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums () pbcty5
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday, March 25, 2012 3:00:38 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sunday, March 25, 2012 2:51:40 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Sunday, March 25, 2012 1:51:33 PM UTC+8, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> > > 
> > > Actually this is not a question about build systems.
> > > Suresh Kumar just wants us(efl-team) to have one good script to build
> > > up-to-date svn codes.
> > > 
> > > easy_17.sh has been doing good job so far. But efl svn code changes a
> > > lot and for some reason easy_17.sh was not updated.
> > > When I see easy_e17.sh link, it has not been updated for a couple of 
> > > years.
> > > http://omicron.homeip.net/​​​projects/easy_e17/easy_e17.sh<http://omicron.homeip.net/projects/easy_e17/easy_e17.sh>
> > >  Maybe Morlenxus was busy or he lost the interest anymore.
> > > 
> > That is the released version. There are at least three other versions 
> > which are at various stages of "up-to-dateness":
> > 
> > 1. morlenxus's dev version:  
> > http://omicron.homeip.net/​​files/easy_e17_preview.sh<http://omicron.homeip.net/files/easy_e17_preview.sh>
> >  2. Jeremy's git ready version: 
> > http://cgit.asynk.ch/cgi-bin/​​cgit/bin/tree/easy_e17.sh<http://cgit.asynk.ch/cgi-bin/cgit/bin/tree/easy_e17.sh>
> >  3. My fork of morlenxus's dev version: 
> > https://github.com/ppurka/​​easy_e17/blob/master/easy_e17_​​preview.sh<https://github.com/ppurka/easy_e17/blob/master/easy_e17_preview.sh>
> >  
> 
> To add to the above, I believe Jeremy's version is the most up to date. 
> And the package list is also more up to date.
> 
> I made the fork because I wanted a different compilation system. In 
> particular, it addresses the problem that raster mentions about the 
> autogenerated "m4 problem" that svn has to deal with. I haven't been very 
> diligent about keeping a very up to date package list because 1) I don't 
> use only the main e packages + some from emodules extra + elm.
> 

Sorry, typo: I meant "I use only the main e packages..."
 

> 2) I don't have the time to update and check whether every package from 
> svn compiles.
> 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure

_______________________________________________
enlightenment-users mailing list
enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]