[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       elinks-dev
Subject:    [elinks-dev] Re: [ELinks] elinks - zas: Move enum format_align to
From:       Laurent MONIN <zas () norz ! org>
Date:       2004-11-21 12:55:51
Message-ID: 20041121135551.69ec35e9.zas () norz ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 03:28:18 +0000
Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters <miciah@myrealbox.com> wrote:

> On 20041119 17:46:10, cvs@pasky.or.cz wrote:
> > This is an automated notification of a change to the ELinks CVS tree.
> > 
> > Author: zas
> > Module: elinks
> > Tag: <TRUNK>
> > Date: Fri Nov 19 17:46:10 2004 GMT
> > 
> > ---- Log message:
> > 
> > Move enum format_align to new util/align.h since it is not bfu specific. Drop \
> > most bfu/style.h inclusions.
> 
> An analysis:
> 
> util/align.h is created with nothing
> but the definition of enum format_align.
> 
> -> For enum format_align, files must now include util/align.h
> where they previously needed util/style.h.
> 
> bfu/button.[ch], bfu/inpfield.h, bfu/listbox.h, and
> document/html/parser.h retain the inclusion for util/align.h.
> 
> bfu/checkbox.[ch], bfu/group.c, bfu/inpfield.c,
> bfu/listbox.c, bfu/msgbox.[ch], bfu/text.[ch],
> and document/css/property.h drop the inclusion,
> but all need enum format_align.
> 
> bfu/leds.c, bfu/menu.c, and bfu/widget.h drop the inclusion
> but don't need it.
> 
> document/css/apply.c adds the inclusion but doesn't need it.
> 
> Is this roughly accurate?

Yes.

Headers files inclusion need some improvments.

--

Zas 
_______________________________________________
ELinks-dev mailing list
ELinks-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]